Follow by Email

Thursday, July 27, 2017

Swampman Sessions????


  "Drain the swamp", was a phrase made popular by President Trump on the campaign trail. It was a phrase that was chanted nationwide. Trump supporters that had tired of the widespread corruption in Washington were invigorated by the President's chant. They were invigorated as for the first time in eight years, America had a leader that vowed to clean up Washington or "drain the swamp". America was hopeful. America was hopeful that if Donald J. Trump became President, he would do what needed to be done. Americans knew that if elected, Donald J. Trump would clean up Washington. Americans had confidence that Donald J. Trump would rid our government of taking advantage of average Americans. Americans knew Donald J. Trump would stop the stealing, payoffs, and crookery that had become the norm in Washington. Americans knew Donald J. Trump would give the country back to the people as so not just our lawmakers could prosper, but average Americans could prosper as well. Americans had confidence that if elected, Donald J. Trump would go after and jail all those who had broken the law. Americans knew Donald J. Trump would lock Hillary Clinton up!

     The day Americans had hoped and prayed for finally came. Donald J. Trump was elected and he became our nation's 45th president. Justice would be served or would it? Six months have passed since President Trump was elected and no indictments have been made, nor has anyone been locked up. Why? Why, is anybody's guess. Why, even President Trump doesn't quite know what to make of no investigations being made into certain persons and or parties. While those in Washington walk free who've seemingly broken the law, the Department of Justice is instead focused on the President and his still not yet proven collusion with Russia. Day after day, week after week, month after month, and the focus is still Russia and the President. 

   The focus today should not be on Russia and the President. The focus should be on Hillary Clinton's use of an unsecured server putting America's security at risk. The focus should be on Hillary Clinton's 33,000 deleted emails. The focus should be on The Clinton Foundation. The focus should be on Loretta Lynch's obstruction of justice. The focus should be on Hillary and Susan Rice and their roles in the Benghazi tragedy. The focus should be on Hillary's alleged lover, Huma Abedin for conspiracy and wire fraud. The focus should be on John Podesta, Hillary's campaign manager's alleged involvement in child trafficking, and pedophilia.  The focus should be on James Comey's leaking of classified information and cleaning up after Hillary. The focus should be on Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch not prosecuting those from HSBC when it was discovered they were laundering funds for drug kingpins and various terrorist groups in the Mid-East including Al-Qaeda. (An inside deal of a $2 Billion fine was made) The focus should be on some 50 plus corpses whom all had connections to the Clintons and or the Democratic party. Seth Rich and Shawn Lucas to name two.  The focus should be on former President Obama's unconstitutional collection of data on Donald Trump. The focus should be on a number of persons and that does not include President Trump. 

  One has to wonder just why has Attorney General Jeff Sessions not had the justice department investigate the widespread corruption that took place within the Obama administration. Could it be that Jeff Sessions is part of the swamp? While Sessions was one of the President's first and most loyal supporters, his unwillingness to do his job and investigate matters that should most definitely be investigated makes one wonder. It also makes perfect sense. It also makes sense, as Sessions conveniently recused himself from the Trump-Russia investigation soon after he was sworn in. While it is no secret Robert Mueller and his pro Hillary collegues on the committee are conducting a witch hunt, Jeff Sessions was the one person who could easily have fired Mueller. Sessions also could have had control over the investigation. With Sessions recusing himself from the investigation, Sessions is no longer in a position to fire Mueller which makes for a very bad situation for the President. It makes for a bad situation as the Special Counsel's investigation into the President, appears to be an attempt to pin the President for a crime or crimes of which he did not commit. 

   Is the Attorney General another Washington swampman? Nothing else can explain the Attorney General not going after Hillary and others, that should with out question be under investigation. Sessions did replace the fired FBI Director, James Comey with a close friend of the former FBI Director. Yes, the acting FBI Director, Andrew McCabe, is indeed a close friend of the fired James Comey. Not only is McCabe a friend of Comey's, but he also was the man in charge of the Clinton investigation that went nowhere fast. In fact, the investigation went nowhere. McCabe also was the recipient of $700,000. from Hillary and her representatives for his wife's political run in 2015. Suffice it to say, McCabe has close ties with the Clintons, leading one to believe that he and the FBI will not be investigating Hillary Clinton, much less anyone else within the Democratic party anytime soon. In fact, the President tweeted "drain the swamp" in reference to Andrew McCabe. Perhaps the President himself is now beginning to wonder if his Attorney General is the man whom he thought he was or a member of the swamp. Unfortunately, for the President, I believe the evidence is stacking up against the Attorney General. While Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been great on cracking down on Sanctuary cities, cutting down illegal immigration, and going after the lawless gang, MS-13, he has been useless on cracking down on those who have committed crimes against our country and are out to destroy the President. With that being said, I am led to believe Attorney General Sessions, may just be "Swampman Sessions".

(c)Sean Bianca GOPGIRL 2017

#FireJamesSessions #DrainTheSwamp #LockHerUp

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Should Muslims be allowed to be Police Officers?

If Only Corpses Could Talk Continues !

 "The Clinton Foundation, they are criminals, they are thieves, they are liars, they are a disgrace."- Klaus Eberwein, last year at a protest at the headquarters of the Clinton Foundation

"The best revenge toward your haters is to be successful"-Klaus Eberwein on Twitter, 5/17/17

    Last year I wrote a blog,  "If Only Corpses Could Talk". The blog detailed six mysterious deaths of persons who had information regarding the Clintons and or the Democratic party and the party's alleged corruption. While there have been many many more mysterious deaths of persons who had worked for and or been involved with the Clintons, I focused on the six that had occurred last year. This year there are now two more corpses whom many wish could talk. Two more corpses of men whom I'm quite sure had much to tell. Much to tell about the Clintons, the most politically corrupt couple in the history of the United States.

     On July 11, 2017 Klaus Eberwein, age 50 shot himself in a hotel room in Miami, Florida. One might believe he would do such a thing if one read the story in the liberal based, Miami Herald on July 12, 2017. The Herald spoke of how Mr. Eberwein had fallen on hard times and faced allegations of fraud and corruption. While true, Mr. Eberwein had fallen on tough times, Eberwein had openly expressed to others that he felt his life was in danger. Mr. Eberwein had been a fierce critic of the Clintons. Just last year he had called the Clintons, criminals, thieves,  liars, and a disgrace. Mr. Eberwein was due to appear in front of a Haitian Senate Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission. As he was the former Director General of the Government Economic Development Agency, also known as FAES from May 2012 - February 2015, Eberwein is said to have had knowledge on misappropriated donations from international donors for the Haitian earthquake fund through the Clinton Foundation. Misappropriated, I'd say so. In fact, only 6% of the donations actually went to various Haitian Earthquake organizations. Another 9.6% went to the Haitian government, and the remaining 89.9% or $5.4 billion are said to have gone to non-Haitian organizations. It is believed that Mr. Eberwein was a wealth of knowledge regarding the missing funds. Unfortunately, a man whom a friend deemed "in good spirits", and found Eberwein's suicide, "really shocking"  will never be able to tell what he presumed to have known about the misappropriated donations.If only corpses could talk...

   On May 14, 2017 Peter Smith, a Republican donor, operative, businessman, and critic of the Clintons was found dead. Mr. Smith had committed suicide by placing a bag with attached helium over his head. Mr. Smith left a seemingly suspicious suicide note, allegedly saying, "NO FOUL PLAY WHATSOEVER". Supposedly, also written in the note was that Smith was taking his own life due to a recent bad turn of health and a $5 million life insurance policy expiring. The note was oddly written in all capital letters. According to a Wall Street analyst who had spoken to Peter Smith the day before the supposed suicide, Smith showed no indications that he was about to take his own life. Smith's death occurred ten days prior to a Wall Street Journal article for which Smith had been interviewed. The article reported on Smith being in the middle of the Russian hackers and Hillary Clinton;s missing 30,000 missing emails of which Smith was attempting to obtain.  Smith was quoted as saying the Russian interface story "would die of its own weight". Unfortunately, Smith who had been a key source in the "Trooper-gate Scandal" findings that nearly derailed Bill Clinton's 1992 Campaign died first. If only corpses could talk...

    If only corpses could talk. What would they say? What do they know? What would they reveal? Unfortunately, there are far too many corpses of men, women, and children surrounding the Clintons. While suicide, suspicious deaths, and killings surrounding those with information regarding the Clintons could be simply a coincidence, it is simply quite suspicious. If only corpses could talk...
(c)Sean Bianca GOPGIRL 2017

#SethRichCoverUp #ShawnLucas #KlausEberweinSuicide #PeterSmithSuicide 



Monday, July 17, 2017

Why Hasn't the FBI Arrested Linda Sarsour?

     If you are still paying interest then Sharia Law hasn't taken over #justsaying - Linda Sarsour on Twitter May 12, 2015

    If you are still paying interest Sharia Law still hasn't taken over America -Linda Sarsour on Twitter May 12, 2015

   You'll know when you're living under Sharia Law if suddenly all your loans & credit cards become interest free. Sound nice, doesn't it? -Linda Sarsour on Twitter May 12, 2015

  Apparently the FBI no longer takes threats on the president and his administration seriously. In the past, if a man, woman, or group called for "war" against the president, that person or group would be arrested immediately. As of today no arrest has been made.  Nearly two weeks ago Palestinian-American anti-Israel, pro-Sharia Law activist, Linda Sarsour, called for Muslims to unite and wage jihad against President Trump and his administration, and to date no action against Sarsour has been taken. Since when is it acceptable for anyone to call for a "holy war" against the president? Since when is it acceptable for anyone to call for a "holy war" against a president's administration? 

   As so it would seem if one is a Muslim they are given a free pass to threaten the president and his administration. While campaigning, President Trump said he would ban all Muslims from entering the United States. The President's sentiments have since changed. Perhaps, banning all Muslims would be extreme. Then again, there are Muslims here in the U.S. at present and around the world that believe in the caliphate and believe that Islam will one day rule the world. In knowing this, one can't help, but be alarmed when a known activist with ties to the terrorist group Hamas calls for "jihad" or a "holy war" against the president and his administration. One also can't help, but wonder why an activist with terrorist ties hasn't been arrested. Is it that the president feels obligated to not go after a Muslim, because she is a Muslim? As so it would appear, yes it is. As if anyone else, a non-Muslim were to call for a "holy war" against the president and his administration, I would guess they would surely be arrested. 

   It is concerning that the arrest of Linda Sarsour has not been made. It is concerning as one can't help, but wonder if the president and his administration are looking the other way, because Linda Sarsour is a Muslim.  As President Trump was widely criticized for his anti-Muslim rhetoric, I would hate to think that he would cave to the critics, but appearances lead one to think perhaps he is. The fact is Linda Sarsour is a known anti-Israel American-Palestinian pro-Sharia Law activist. The fact is Linda Sarsour did call for Muslims in the name of Allah to wage "jihad" against our president and his administration. The fact is Linda Sarsour should be in jail. The fact is Linda Sarsour calling for "jihad" against the president and his administration makes her a threat to the president. The fact is Linda Sarsour calling for Muslims to unite as to wage "jihad" on the president and his administration makes Linda Sarsour a homegrown terrorist and an enemy of the State. Any enemy of the State should not be tolerated. They should be arrested without hesitation regardless of their religious affiliation. With that being said, why hasn't the FBI arrested Linda Sarsour?
-Sean Bianca GOPGIRL 2017
#LindaSarsour #ArrestLindaSarsour 

Wednesday, July 12, 2017



  Russia, Russia, Russia, all the talk in mainstream media and among the Democrats is Russia. Well, if the mainstream media and Democrats want to talk about Russia, let's talk about Russia! Let's talk about the FACT that former President Obama, his administration, Hillary Clinton, and the State Department approved the sale of 20% of U.S. uranium assets. Let's talk about the "radioactive scandal". The scandal to the tune of more than $145 million in secret donations involving the "Russian government", foreign financiers, and the Clinton Foundation. The fact is mainstream media and the Democrats want to talk about Russia, but only "their" side of Russia, and "their" side of Russia is only falsehoods, and misguided information in regards to the Trump administration and Russia. The fact is there is reason to talk, "Russia", a $145 million reason to talk "Russia".

   Want to talk about "Russia"? Just ask the author, Peter Schweizer, of the New York Times best selling book, "Clinton Cash". In 2015 Schweizer's book was a New York Times best seller that the Clintons feared. Turns out the book, revealing how the Clintons went from having millions of dollars in debt to earning over $130 million was somewhat ignored. As mainstream media wanted Hillary to win the 2016 presidential election, there was little talk about the best selling book, "Clinton Cash". The book revealed how the Clintons were made rich, very rich with the help of foreign governments, like "Russia" and  "Saudi Arabia" and foreign businesses, and oh yes, the infamous, "Clinton Foundation".  This best seller so feared by the Clintons was never even mentioned during the campaign by the press. Not only was it not mentioned, it was pretty much ignored. A multi million dollar deal involving 20 percent of all U.S. uranium assets was made, and not once was presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, questioned about it in any of the numerous presidential debates. Trivial questions such as one on regarding Rosie O'Donnell were asked of our President, yet a question involving 20% of all U.S. uranium assets and $145 million payment to the Clinton Foundation were not of enough relevancy to ask Hillary Clinton? Apparently not. 

  Mainstream media, including the fair and balanced Fox stayed away from "Clinton Cash". They all stayed away from "Clinton Cash", as they knew every  bit of information in it was true. "Clinton Cash" couldn't be debunked. While everyone may have stayed away from "Clinton Cash", there was NO denying, "Clinton Cash". Why even two Pulitzer Prize winning investigative reporters, Jo Beck and Mike McIntire couldn't even "debunk" two of the most damaging chapters in Schweizer's, "Clinton Cash". In fact, Beck and McIntire ran a 3000 word New York Times front page piece validating Schweizer's claims. His claims, that Bill and Hillary Clinton aided a Mr. Frank Giustra, a Canadian financier and a small Canadian company in their obtainment of quite lucrative uranium mining concession from the Dictator in Kazakhstan. This same Canadian company which was renamed, "Uranium One", purchased uranium concessions in the United States. Russia, having a desire for uranium, then later purchased the Canadian company for a price Canadian investors couldn't refuse, and this is where the plot thickens...

  In order for the Russians to purchase the Canadian company, Uranium One, the approval of former President Obama and Hillary Clinton's State Department would have had to have been given. Why? Because uranium was and still is an important strategic commodity. A commodity worth up to $145 million. Coincidentally, $145 million in donations was given by nine share holders of Uranium One to the Clinton Foundation. These donations were made subject to the State Department's approval, and as Hillary was at the time the Secretary of State, the donations were approved with bells and whistles. These donations included donations from the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Teller, the Russian government, and other foreign financiers.  Thanks to Hillary Clinton, Russia at present owns twenty percent of  U.S. uranium assets.  When once questioned by a brazen reporter about the uranium deal, Hillary stated that the deal was untrue. She stated that she was not yet the Secretary of State and the dates failed to match up. She was incorrect, the dates did and still do match up. Another words, Hillary lied, but let's talk more about Russia...

   Russia, Russia, Russia. If mainstream media wants to talk about Russia, they need to educate the American people on not only the alleged collusion of the President's camp with Russia, but Hillary Clinton's receiving of $145 million from the Russian government and other foreign investors. The media wants to talk about Russia, then the media should talk about the "radioactive scandal" in which Hillary Clinton sold 20 percent of all U.S. uranium assets to Russia. Yes, let's talk,"Russia"!

#radiocativescandal #uraniumone #ClintonCash


Monday, July 10, 2017

"We Want God" And Oh Yea, The Meeting With Putin

  And when the day came on June 2nd, 1979, and one million Poles gathered around Victory Square for their very first mass with their Polish Pope, that day, every communist in Warsaw must have known that their oppressive system would soon come crashing down.They must have known it at the exact moment during Pope John Paul II's sermon when a million Polish men, women, and children suddenly raised their voices in a single prayer. A million Polish people did not ask for wealth. They did not ask for privilege. Instead, one million Poles sang three simple words: "We Want God." 
In those words, the Polish people recalled the promise of a better future. They found new courage to face down their oppressors, and they found the words to declare that Poland would be Poland once again.
As I stand here today before this incredible crowd, this faithful nation, we can still hear those voices that echo through history. Their message is as true today as ever. The people of Poland, the people of America, and the people of Europe still cry out "We want God."-President Donald Trump, Speech in Warsaw, Poland 
   "We want God", said America's President to the people of Poland. "We want God", three little words that reached out to the people of Poland and around the world. For the first time in a long time, an American President, said, "God", in a speech. For the first time in a long time, an American President not only said , "God", but he said, "we want God". For the people in Warsaw, Poland that were in attendance for President Trump's speech, those 3 little words were like music to the people's ears. For Christians around the world, those three little words were not little words at all. Those three little words meant everything and more to Christians around the world. "We want God", may have been taken from the Polish people and their desire for freedom, but "we want God", was and is also what a good many Christians feel and had felt, and have been, and are afraid to say out loud.  After two centuries of oppression, the Polish people were finally allowed to live in freedom.  They today stand as a free nation and are able to say out loud, "we want God". 

    The speech given in Warsaw, Poland was truly historic and touted as such by right wing journalists and critics. The speech truly invigorated the people of Poland as they listened to President Trump, and stood chanting, "Donald Trump, Donald Trump", and  waving American flags. The crowd was visibly in awe of America's newly elected President. They were in awe as the speech being delivered was truly a phenomenal speech. The speech not only brought "God" to the front lines of today's society, but the speech said something so many people needed so badly to hear. The President spoke of how  Poland, "gave all hope for a future in which good conquers evil". In a modern Europe where the threat of terrorism is an everyday possibility, those words were inspiring and comforting. In a modern Europe with open borders, the President spoke of countries protecting borders as to protect their citizens. With European feeling the devastating impact at present with open borders, President Trump's words were  profound. The President said exactly everything the people of Poland wanted to hear. The President also said everything European leaders most likely didn't want to hear, but so desperately needed to hear. 

     No sooner had mainstream media said little about President Trump's all historic speech did mainstream media then be so quick to jump on the President to criticize. The speech has now been criticized as it was too highly of a nationalist address.  One might think the media would have been somewhat surprised with the president's speaking out on Russia being a threat to western civilization, the media did not. Mainstream media could not  applaud the President for his brilliant speech in Warsaw, but they could not act fast enough with their snide commentary on his meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Some critics likened the meeting to an awkward Tinder date. Others jumped on how President Trump failed to press Putin on the subject of election meddling. How could the President have been any more brazen and pressing than to walk into the  meeting with Putin and immediately confront Putin on election meddling? The President could not have been any more forthright. While Democrats may not like the answer which was a flat out "no", do the Democrats honestly think Putin would have admitted to meddling in the 2016 Presidential election? Furthermore, there is zero proof of Russia meddling in our election . There is also zero proof that there was collusion between Russia and President Trump. Unfortunately, the Democrats refuse to accept the truth. The truth that they nominated the worst candidate for the 2016 Presidential election. The truth, that the people of this great nation had tired of failed liberal economic policies, failing health care, and failed illegal immigration and open border policies.

   As mainstream media seems to be stuck on the alleged collusion between the President and Russia, others are far more concerned with the present. At present, President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin have reached what U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson calls, a "defined agreement" on curbing violence or rather a "cease fire" in Syria. While the cease fire may not solve the Syrian crisis, it's a start. The two Presidents also spoke of the creation of a cyber security group or unit that would guard countries against election hacking and other negative cyber threats as well. Not surprisingly, President Trump was highly criticized for his talk of the creation of a cyber security unit with Russia and he has since somewhat backtracked on the idea. 

  "We want God" still weighs heavy on my mind. Apparently, "we want God", weighed not on the minds of those on the left. No, all the chatter has been nothing but the meeting with Putin, and the infamous sit in by First Daughter, Ivanka. The President left a meeting with other world leaders as to attend another meeting and he filled his seat with his daughter Ivanka. This action by the President sparked heavy much deserved criticism from the left . While it is customary for a President to have one of his  like minded Representatives fill his vacant seat, daughter Ivanka was simply unacceptable. The fact is, the First Daughter is not a Conservative. Ivanka is a registered Independent globalist who leans to the left , much like her husband, Jared. The conservative sons of the President would have been a far better choice as they do in fact share the same views as their father.  While it is infuriating that mainstream media has criticized a highly successful over seas trip by the president, it is at the same time amusing. It is amusing as First Daughter, Ivanka shares many if not the majority of the same viewpoints as those on the left. 

"We want God", is what should be in the hearts and minds of people when speaking of the President's latest trip overseas. For eight years America had a President defending the very people killing Christians, and today America has a President defending Christians for a change. The President's confronting Russian Vladidmir Putin on the alleged election meddling the moment he met Putin should have made headlines. The President's speech in Poland should have made headlines. "We want God", should have made headlines. Sadly, only the tired criticism of President Trump, and his daughter taking his seat made most headlines. Sadly, "we want God" failed to make the headlines. Sadly, mainstream media chooses to ignore that the President is correct. The President is correct to encourage the rhetoric of a nation wanting God, as in this dangerous world, the world that doesn't want "God" will desperately need "God".

(c)Sean Bianca GOPGIRLBLOG 2017



Monday, July 3, 2017

Wanted, Rubio, And Others For Treason !


   "If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter." ~ George Washington

      Article II of the United States Constitution states in Section 4 that"The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and misdemeanors."

    Wanted; Senators Marco Rubio (Fl.), Dane Feinstein(Ca.), Susan Collins (Me.), Kamala Harris(Ca.), Barbara Comstock(Va.), and Tammy Duckworth(Il.) for treason. On April 4, 2017, the Senate unbeknownst to most Americans, passed Senate Resolution 118. The resolution was introduced by Senator Harris and drafted by a Muslim organization, EmgageUSA, and the Muslim Public Affairs Council. Resolution 118 condemns hate crime and any other form of racism, religion, or ethnic bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus targeting a minority in the United States. Furthermore, this law will form an inter-agency task force. This task force will go after people who speak out against Muslims or the so called "protected class". Translation of this bill; the loss of your freedom of speech. 

   Americans should be irate as this is the beginning of the end for America. Thanks to little Marco Rubio and others, Americans are in danger of losing the country as they have known it. Little Marco, once elected by the Tea Party, was instrumental in working on getting this bill passed. Why EmgageUSA, formerly known as EmergeUSA even thanked Marco Rubio and his fellow constituents on their Facebook page; Thanks to the hard work of Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Senator Susan Collins, Senator Barbara Comstock,  and Senator Kamala Harris, we have achieved the approval of Senate Resolution 118, an anti-hate crimes bill drafted by Emerge-USA. It is days like this that Americans are reminded of this country’s founding principles: equal opportunity, freedom, justice. We are proud to help support the protection of these rights #amoreperfectunion #theamericandream”.

  While the thank you was awfully thoughtful, the fact that Muslims were celebrating Senate Resolution 118 was slightly disturbing. One of the very groups that worked to get this bill passed, EmgageUSA, has several members under close scrutiny under the FBI.  Throughout the years, Emerge, now Emgage, has had a number of events at terror linked-mosques and has also had several of its members placed on the terrorist watch list.

The co-founder of EmgageUSA (founded in 2006 as EmergeUSA), Khurrum Wahid, a South Florida attorney, is the organization’s National Board Co-Chair. In a 2011 interview with The Intelligence Report, the magazine of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), Wahid listed the numerous cases in which he has represented terrorists, including members of Al Qaeda, such as Omar Ahmed Abu Ali, who was sentenced to 30 years in prison in 2006 for joining al-Qaeda and plotting to assassinate President George W. Bush, Shahawar Matin Siraj, who was sentenced to 30 years in prison in 2007 for conspiring to plant bombs in New York City; Dr. Rafiq Sabir, who was convicted of conspiring to treat injured al-Qaeda fighters and was sentenced to 25 years in prison in 2007; Syed Hashmi, who was sentenced to 15 years in prison in 2010 for providing supplies and money to a senior al-Qaeda commander in Afghanistan. He also represented Hafiz Khan, who was sentenced to 25 years in federal prison in 2013 for funneling tens of thousands of dollars to the Pakistani Taliban. -

   While many Americans may care not to know more of their freedom of speech being taken away, the threat of Sharia Law might wake up those uncaring Americans. Senate Resolution 118 and House Resolution 257 will be the end of America as we have known it. If the two resolutions are passed into actual law, the law as it is written "will criminalize free speech". Our founding fathers gave us the "freedom of speech". Our founding fathers also gave the president the power to ban anyone threatening our country from coming into the country. Our founding fathers knew our great nation would inevitably have outsiders wanting to threaten our freedom and our way of life. Senate Resolution 118 and House Resolution 257 are all a part of a plan much greater than any American could ever imagine. These resolutions are a part of the plan to destroy America and take over America. The Muslim Brotherhood's plan has been all along, to eventually replace the U.S. Constitution with Sharia Law. The Muslim Brotherhood's plan is to chip away at our constitution with various laws like House Resolution 257 and  Senate Resolution 118. Both resolutions conveniently exclude Christians, yet protect Muslims. If passed, both resolutions will be the end of America, and it will be the fault of our Senators, Congressmen, President, and people,  for not speaking out and not taking action.

     America, the Trojan Horse, President Donald Trump spoke about, is already here in America. It is living and breathing in everyone's state, and everyone's town. The caliphate is here and it's here to take over America. America has been warned, and it is up to our President and lawmakers to stop it. The question is, are we too late?

(c)Sean Bianca GOPGIRL #SenateResolution118 #HouseResolution257


          HOUSE RESOLUTION 118