Follow by Email

Monday, August 14, 2017

Save The Elephants!

Please donate if you can! 

David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust

Two Tails Ranch

The Left's Refusal To Learn From The Past

     America, the home of the brave and the home of the "free", sadly, is no longer "free". America is no longer "free" when Americans no longer have the freedom to express how they truly feel. Social media outlets such as Face book and Twitter now censor and take down content that they deem unpleasing, while the left wing media prints only what favors and hides the corruption and deception of the left. As our freedom of speech is violated daily on social media, it is violated as well on the ground. Unfortunately,  freedom of speech is more often than not lost by those on the right.

    When did America become like a third world country with widespread violence, protests, and chaos? When did America become so filled with hate that America could easily be seen as being on the brink of a civil war? America became a hellhole of hate and violence the day Hillary Clinton lost and the Democrats didn't get their way. Yes, the left lost and seven months later the left is continuing their kicking, screaming, crying, and punching, literally. Almost weekly there are protests and rallies taking place across America, and it's America's freedom of speech that allows Americans to take to the streets as to protest or throw a rally. However, as so it would seem, whenever the right takes to the streets, violence occurs, and that violence is not usually instigated by those on the right, but by those on the left. Never at a women's march or a leftist protest are there bus loads of conservatives to be seen spending their time at a rally of protest of the other side. Never are their people from the right found that have been paid to punch, hit, or intimidate those on the left at a leftist march. Yet, time and time again billionaire Globalist George Soros is the majority of the time found to be paying people to attack those on the right at right wing rallies and protests, leaving many on the right with a loss of their freedom of speech. 

   Two days ago in Charlottesville, 3 people were unnecessarily killed. One woman was mowed down by a car driving through rally goers and two policemen were killed in a police helicopter crash. Why? Why is because the left has a need to erase the past, their past. Across the south are a little over 700 Confederate statues and monuments, statues, and monuments that much of the left wants removed. While Europe values their history be it good or bad, the left here in America has a desire to destroy our history. While the left seems to have a desire to erase history, the right has a desire to preserve and learn from history. Furthermore, one has to ask the question, aren't there better ways to spend tax dollars than on the taking down of Confederate statues and monuments? With our nation's roads, bridges, railroads, and airports in decline, one would think the priority of necessity over a simple want due to dislike would come first. With many of our vets in need, one would think tax dollars could be better spent towards them. With the mentally ill unable to work and take care of themselves and living on the streets, one would think their care would take precedence over the taking down of statues the left sees as racist and or offensive. One would think many issues would take precedence over the taking down of over 700 statues and monuments, but the left feels differently. The left prefers to waste tax dollars taking down Confederate statues that remind them of the hate in their party. The left prefers to waste tax dollars to replace Confederate statues with whatever they feel non offensive than to use tax dollars for good. The left prefers to waste tax dollars erasing a part of American history over leaving history alone as so the future may learn of the hate and bigotry of the past. 

    Saturday was to be about "Unite the Right's"  rally to save the Confederate statue of General Robert E. Lee. It was about Americans wanting to preserve their history, our history. Unite the Right had a permit and the rally was peaceful until it wasn't. Busloads of people from the radical leftist group Antifa and Black Lives Matter arrived in Charlottesville to wreak havoc on the peaceful rally being held. Antifa is the same group that was largely responsible for the violence this past spring in Berkeley. Antifa is nothing, but a bunch of radical left wing thugs who use violence and intimidation to advance their beliefs, while Black Lives Matter is an anti-White hate group. Both groups were mainly responsible for Saturday's violence. It has also been reported that billionaire Globalist George Soros was also behind the violence ensued as well. That being said, yesterday the left stole freedom of speech from the right.

   The left seems to routinely take it upon themselves to steal the right's freedom of speech and if it continues, it's the beginning of the end for America as a free nation. While yes, there were racist groups from the right at Saturday's rally, and they are to be condemned, the original attendees and organizers of Saturday's rally had a permit and were peaceful. They were non-violent. The rally for Unite The Right held in Charlottesville never had to turn chaotic and deadly. When Antifa, and Black Lives Matter arrived and attacked those they opposed, the police did nothing. It has been reported the police stood and watched. They stood and watched the violence and allowed the freedom of speech of Americans be taken away. For that, America should weep. America should weep as the left is taking over America if incidents such as Charlottesville continue to take place. America needs to stop the protesting, stop the rallies, stop the hate. America needs to step back and say, "enough". America needs to unite, for if we don't, our nation is sure to fall. With that, I have to say it was the left's piece of history that the left so badly wants to destroy; that piece of history of a time of bigotry from the left. Yesterday added another piece of hate and bigotry to our nation's history. Yesterday was another day of hate and bigotry from the left showing that the left refuses to learn from their failures of the past. 

(c)Sean Bianca GOP GIRL 2017

Sunday, August 13, 2017

The OTHER Five ►San Antonio monument protest

My point was, why are we wasting tax dollars to take down pieces of our history. Tax dollars that could help the less fortunate on the left , tax dollars that could be used for our Vets, the mentally ill, the truly poor in need who can not work, our roads, our schools, our bridges, and so on. It seems like a waste of time and money to take down monuments that remind us of the past. We must never forget the tragedies of the past, for if we do, we will not learn from the past as to not repeat it. For the record, the monument being protested was of Robert E. Lee, a Democrat who was one of the few that opposed slavery, but far be it for the left to point out facts!

Thursday, August 10, 2017

Candidate arrested defending monuments- Interview

America being taken over by the Swamp!

   America is in danger. America is in serious danger. Our President is in danger.  Our President is in serious danger.  America and President Trump are under attack by the globalists, the socialists, the elitists, and the establishment, and they will stop at nothing to accomplish their goal. Their goal is to remove President Trump from office and to destroy everything and anything of which America was made, and they have successfully worked their way right into the White House and the President's administration. In fact, the Deep State is in the President's administration.

   As reported by Roger Stone, who has been a confidante to the President, a best selling author, and correspondent for Infowars, National Security adviser, General H. R. McMasters is one of the leakers. In fact, McMasters is not just one of the leakers, he is one of the primary leakers of all of the goings on within the walls of the White House. McMasters, as according to sources of Roger Stone, is an operative for the billionaire, globalist, socialist, George Soros. The Israeli government and Israeli intelligence have intercepted email correspondence between McMasters and George Soros informing Soros of all goings on within the White House and the President's administration. Roger Stone has double checked his information with two separate sources high up in Israeli's intelligence and has no doubt he can confirm this with the Israeli Ambassador to the United States. That being said, if this is true, which by all accounts it appears to be, General McMasters is one of the primary leakers to the press, as George Soros has ties to all of mainstream media. 

  Being National Security Adviser, General McMaster's ties to George Soros is deeply disturbing. It should not be all that surprising. Apparently, as early as this past May, the President and McMasters were seen clashing. As the pick of McMasters was pleasing to the Washington establishment, it was not a pick pleasing to the President. In essence, the President was said to be experiencing buyers remorse as the two clearly have different visions for the nation. McMasters is everything the President campaigned against, while the President is everything McMasters is not. One vast difference between the two which many feel is unacceptable is McMasters dislike of calling out Islamic terrorists as "radical Islamic terrorists". In fact anyone using that rhetoric under McMasters is likely to be reprimanded or even fired, a sharp difference indeed, between the President and his National Security Adviser.  It has been reported that the two have even been seen sparring in front of White House Staff, as McMasters has repeatedly attempted to undermine the president and has failed to allow the President the opportunity to ask questions. McMasters has even gone so far as to lecture the President. Many feel McMasters is attempting to trick the President into steering the nation in a direction that was everything the President campaigned against. 

  McMasters has to go. He is the swamp, and a question that has to be asked is why did the President invite the swamp into the White House? McMasters removed Chief Strategist, and Nationalist, Steve Bannon from the National Security Council.  McMasters also just recently removed several National Security Council staffers hired by former National Security Adviser, Mike Flynn. Those just recently removed from their positions were allies to White House Chief Strategist, Steve Bannon, pro- America first, and loyal to the President. Essentially, staffers having the agenda of making America great again, and staffers not likely leaking info to outsiders have been removed. The question is why? The next question is why is the President allowing this to take place?

  The Deep State is in the White House, and the question is who in the White House can be trusted and who can not? Apparently, it's anybody's guess. Unfortunately, it doesn't appear the President's Generals can be trusted. As it is now pretty apparent National Security Adviser is of the Deep State, so too may be General John Kelly, and National Defense Secretary, "Mad DogyMattis. While many thought the appointment of General Kelly as Chief of Staff was a good move, it is now seen as a not so good move. General Kelly may not be a smart move by the President, as Kelly appears to have more power than anyone should have over the President. by all accounts Kelly apparently has isolated the President, and has full control of the President. While someone overseeing and approving the President's tweets was seen as a positive action, Kelly's controlling who and what the president sees is clearly a negative action. It has been reported that the President is not allowed to see anything reported by news sources such as Drudge, Breibart, and Infowars as any info seen by the President might spark what General Kelly sees as an unwanted reaction. What is going on? What is going on is the President is being handled as some sort of bumbling idiot that is being handled by these 3 generals. Three Generals that do not have the best interests of the President at heart. Three Generals that do not have the best interests of the nation at heart.

   The President is far from being an idiot and the President is far from being okay with a person on his staff refusing to say "radical Islam".  The President is also far from okay with having someone beneath him tell him who he sees, to whom he speaks, what he tweets, what he reads, and what he hears. With that being said, America has to ask, just what is going on? Where is the President for whom we voted? It has been rumored that there is a coup to remove the President from office, and having three Generals on staff may not be a wise choice by the President, but then were these three Generals the President's choice? Did he have a choice? Something's going on and America is at risk. When an anti-establishment President endorses a man like Luther Strange, a RINO who opposes all the President is about, one has to ask, just what is going on? When a President, President Trump keeps a man on staff who tells his staff they may not use the words, "radical Islam", one has to ask, just what is going on? When a President who was strong willed and won an election being whom he wanted to be and not what others wanted him to be is being told what to do and say, one has to ask, just what is going on? What's going on is one of three things and none are what we who voted for this man want to hear. Number one, the swamp has lured the President in and he can't get out. Number two, the President and or his family have been threatened in some way, or number three, we've been hoodwinked and the president is a fraud. I fail to believe President Trump is a fraud. Therefore, it's one of the other two, and that is deeply disturbing. It's deeply disturbing as I hope I'm wrong, but if our President has been compromised in some way, our country and its values have been lost.  With God's help, I hope our President can make this once great nation great again.
(c)Sean Bianca GOP GIRL 2017

Tuesday, August 1, 2017

John McCain's Vengeance On The American People


   One must always watch one's tongue prior to lashing out at another. Why? The answer is rather simple. One never knows when they may someday need that person. Unfortunately, for President Trump, he needed John McCain. He needed John McCain's vote for skinny repeal. Sadly, President Trump's infamous insult may well have helped cost the American people the vote on Friday's skinny repeal vote. Senator John McCain, who the President said was only a hero due to being caught, cast the vote that cost skinny repeal from going forward. One can't help, but wonder if John McCain's failure to vote for skinny repeal was McCain's way of getting back at the President. McCain just out of surgery, made it back to Washington just in time to take his revenge out on the President with his vote of "no" on "skinny repeal". The trouble is, McCain didn't really hurt the President at all. No, the President was disappointed, but it was the American people who were hurt in the crossfire between the President and John McCain. 

   The President tweeted that the Republicans look like fools and that they were wasting time by  preserving a filibuster. Many Americans are in complete agreement. The Republicans do look like fools. In fact, to the majority of the American people, the Republicans don't just look like fools, they look like a bunch of do nothing, pompous imbeciles. With all due respect, the Republicans are an utter embarrassment to the Republican party. They are an embarrassment due to their complete inability to come up with a replacement for Obamacare. The Republicans had seven years to work on a plan, and yet they did not. Exactly what the Republicans have been doing these past seven years is any body's guess. As so it would seem, the Republicans appear to have taken an seven year hiatus. In their hiatus, the Republicans appear to have forgotten what it is to be a Republican. They forgot why they were elected, picked up their paychecks, and kissed the feet of former President Obama. With the Republicans failure to fight Obama, they failed the American people and did nothing. If the Republicans accomplished anything other than bowing down to Obama, Americans would love to know.  They sure as heck didn't work on an acceptable and successful health care replacement for Obamacare. They did not as they never thought in a million years that they'd have the chance to propose a new and improved health care bill. The Republicans were losers, and they had planned on losing again in 2016.The Republicans never thought a Republican, let alone Donald J. Trump, would win the 2016 Presidential election. The Republicans planned on losing and therefore the Republicans failed to have a plan in place to replace the imploding Obamacare. 

  Unfortunately,  the Republicans in Washington have failed the American people who put them in office. However, as luck would have it, for the American people, the American people will soon have an opportunity to fire those in Washington who have failed them. Those who have failed the American people in Washington can and will be voted out. America at present feels a well deserved sense of hostility towards many of the Republicans in Washington. However, there are three Republicans that should be singled out for their direct betrayal of the President and the American people. Senator Susan Collins of Maine, Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Senator John McCain of Arizona. It is these three Republicans who turned their backs on the American people in their votes of "no" on "skinny repeal". It is these three Republicans who have not honored the President's agenda, and in doing so, they have hurt the American people. 

     Did John McCain's bruised ego and animosity towards the President hurt the American people? Yes,  it did. With the majority of Americans paying at least $3000. more for their health care in 2017 than in 2013, Americans are being financially crucified. Hard working Americans' health insurance premiums have increased to a degree that's simply unaffordable to many, while Americans choosing not to work reap the benefits of free or ridiculously cheap health insurance premiums. Many Americans are choosing to pay the penalty for not being enrolled in Obamacare as opposed to paying for insurance they simply can not afford. Other Americans who are capable of paying the all too high premiums are unable to pay the sky rocketing deductibles. Others that have Obamacare are canceled due to providers pulling out of Obamacare. All in all, Obamacare is an utter disaster, and it's a disaster that we, the people of this once free and great nation never asked for. We, the people, never asked for Obamacare. We, the people, were lied to by former President Obama. We, the people, were told that we could "keep our plan". We, the people, were told we could, "keep our doctors". We could not. We, the people, were lied to and we, the people, are forced to buy a product we do not want. That being said, Obamacare is "UNCONSTITUTIONAL", and if Obamacare is "unconstitutional", why must we continue to abide by the rules of Obamacare? With all of the great Republicans we have elected into office that are attorneys, I have to ask, just what are they waiting for? By law, "repeal and replace" should not be a hard case. By law, Obamacare should be repealed without a vote, and the case should be closed. By law John McCain's bruised ego, and vengeance against the President should not hurt the American people at all. By law, Obamacare should again be repealed, and case closed!
(c)Sean Bianca GOPGIRL 2017


Thursday, July 27, 2017

Swampman Sessions????


  "Drain the swamp", was a phrase made popular by President Trump on the campaign trail. It was a phrase that was chanted nationwide. Trump supporters that had tired of the widespread corruption in Washington were invigorated by the President's chant. They were invigorated as for the first time in eight years, America had a leader that vowed to clean up Washington or "drain the swamp". America was hopeful. America was hopeful that if Donald J. Trump became President, he would do what needed to be done. Americans knew that if elected, Donald J. Trump would clean up Washington. Americans had confidence that Donald J. Trump would rid our government of taking advantage of average Americans. Americans knew Donald J. Trump would stop the stealing, payoffs, and crookery that had become the norm in Washington. Americans knew Donald J. Trump would give the country back to the people as so not just our lawmakers could prosper, but average Americans could prosper as well. Americans had confidence that if elected, Donald J. Trump would go after and jail all those who had broken the law. Americans knew Donald J. Trump would lock Hillary Clinton up!

     The day Americans had hoped and prayed for finally came. Donald J. Trump was elected and he became our nation's 45th president. Justice would be served or would it? Six months have passed since President Trump was elected and no indictments have been made, nor has anyone been locked up. Why? Why, is anybody's guess. Why, even President Trump doesn't quite know what to make of no investigations being made into certain persons and or parties. While those in Washington walk free who've seemingly broken the law, the Department of Justice is instead focused on the President and his still not yet proven collusion with Russia. Day after day, week after week, month after month, and the focus is still Russia and the President. 

   The focus today should not be on Russia and the President. The focus should be on Hillary Clinton's use of an unsecured server putting America's security at risk. The focus should be on Hillary Clinton's 33,000 deleted emails. The focus should be on The Clinton Foundation. The focus should be on Loretta Lynch's obstruction of justice. The focus should be on Hillary and Susan Rice and their roles in the Benghazi tragedy. The focus should be on Hillary's alleged lover, Huma Abedin for conspiracy and wire fraud. The focus should be on John Podesta, Hillary's campaign manager's alleged involvement in child trafficking, and pedophilia.  The focus should be on James Comey's leaking of classified information and cleaning up after Hillary. The focus should be on Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch not prosecuting those from HSBC when it was discovered they were laundering funds for drug kingpins and various terrorist groups in the Mid-East including Al-Qaeda. (An inside deal of a $2 Billion fine was made) The focus should be on some 50 plus corpses whom all had connections to the Clintons and or the Democratic party. Seth Rich and Shawn Lucas to name two.  The focus should be on former President Obama's unconstitutional collection of data on Donald Trump. The focus should be on a number of persons and that does not include President Trump. 

  One has to wonder just why has Attorney General Jeff Sessions not had the justice department investigate the widespread corruption that took place within the Obama administration. Could it be that Jeff Sessions is part of the swamp? While Sessions was one of the President's first and most loyal supporters, his unwillingness to do his job and investigate matters that should most definitely be investigated makes one wonder. It also makes perfect sense. It also makes sense, as Sessions conveniently recused himself from the Trump-Russia investigation soon after he was sworn in. While it is no secret Robert Mueller and his pro Hillary collegues on the committee are conducting a witch hunt, Jeff Sessions was the one person who could easily have fired Mueller. Sessions also could have had control over the investigation. With Sessions recusing himself from the investigation, Sessions is no longer in a position to fire Mueller which makes for a very bad situation for the President. It makes for a bad situation as the Special Counsel's investigation into the President, appears to be an attempt to pin the President for a crime or crimes of which he did not commit. 

   Is the Attorney General another Washington swampman? Nothing else can explain the Attorney General not going after Hillary and others, that should with out question be under investigation. Sessions did replace the fired FBI Director, James Comey with a close friend of the former FBI Director. Yes, the acting FBI Director, Andrew McCabe, is indeed a close friend of the fired James Comey. Not only is McCabe a friend of Comey's, but he also was the man in charge of the Clinton investigation that went nowhere fast. In fact, the investigation went nowhere. McCabe also was the recipient of $700,000. from Hillary and her representatives for his wife's political run in 2015. Suffice it to say, McCabe has close ties with the Clintons, leading one to believe that he and the FBI will not be investigating Hillary Clinton, much less anyone else within the Democratic party anytime soon. In fact, the President tweeted "drain the swamp" in reference to Andrew McCabe. Perhaps the President himself is now beginning to wonder if his Attorney General is the man whom he thought he was or a member of the swamp. Unfortunately, for the President, I believe the evidence is stacking up against the Attorney General. While Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been great on cracking down on Sanctuary cities, cutting down illegal immigration, and going after the lawless gang, MS-13, he has been useless on cracking down on those who have committed crimes against our country and are out to destroy the President. With that being said, I am led to believe Attorney General Sessions, may just be "Swampman Sessions".

(c)Sean Bianca GOPGIRL 2017

#FireJamesSessions #DrainTheSwamp #LockHerUp

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Should Muslims be allowed to be Police Officers?

If Only Corpses Could Talk Continues !

 "The Clinton Foundation, they are criminals, they are thieves, they are liars, they are a disgrace."- Klaus Eberwein, last year at a protest at the headquarters of the Clinton Foundation

"The best revenge toward your haters is to be successful"-Klaus Eberwein on Twitter, 5/17/17

    Last year I wrote a blog,  "If Only Corpses Could Talk". The blog detailed six mysterious deaths of persons who had information regarding the Clintons and or the Democratic party and the party's alleged corruption. While there have been many many more mysterious deaths of persons who had worked for and or been involved with the Clintons, I focused on the six that had occurred last year. This year there are now two more corpses whom many wish could talk. Two more corpses of men whom I'm quite sure had much to tell. Much to tell about the Clintons, the most politically corrupt couple in the history of the United States.

     On July 11, 2017 Klaus Eberwein, age 50 shot himself in a hotel room in Miami, Florida. One might believe he would do such a thing if one read the story in the liberal based, Miami Herald on July 12, 2017. The Herald spoke of how Mr. Eberwein had fallen on hard times and faced allegations of fraud and corruption. While true, Mr. Eberwein had fallen on tough times, Eberwein had openly expressed to others that he felt his life was in danger. Mr. Eberwein had been a fierce critic of the Clintons. Just last year he had called the Clintons, criminals, thieves,  liars, and a disgrace. Mr. Eberwein was due to appear in front of a Haitian Senate Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission. As he was the former Director General of the Government Economic Development Agency, also known as FAES from May 2012 - February 2015, Eberwein is said to have had knowledge on misappropriated donations from international donors for the Haitian earthquake fund through the Clinton Foundation. Misappropriated, I'd say so. In fact, only 6% of the donations actually went to various Haitian Earthquake organizations. Another 9.6% went to the Haitian government, and the remaining 89.9% or $5.4 billion are said to have gone to non-Haitian organizations. It is believed that Mr. Eberwein was a wealth of knowledge regarding the missing funds. Unfortunately, a man whom a friend deemed "in good spirits", and found Eberwein's suicide, "really shocking"  will never be able to tell what he presumed to have known about the misappropriated donations.If only corpses could talk...

   On May 14, 2017 Peter Smith, a Republican donor, operative, businessman, and critic of the Clintons was found dead. Mr. Smith had committed suicide by placing a bag with attached helium over his head. Mr. Smith left a seemingly suspicious suicide note, allegedly saying, "NO FOUL PLAY WHATSOEVER". Supposedly, also written in the note was that Smith was taking his own life due to a recent bad turn of health and a $5 million life insurance policy expiring. The note was oddly written in all capital letters. According to a Wall Street analyst who had spoken to Peter Smith the day before the supposed suicide, Smith showed no indications that he was about to take his own life. Smith's death occurred ten days prior to a Wall Street Journal article for which Smith had been interviewed. The article reported on Smith being in the middle of the Russian hackers and Hillary Clinton;s missing 30,000 missing emails of which Smith was attempting to obtain.  Smith was quoted as saying the Russian interface story "would die of its own weight". Unfortunately, Smith who had been a key source in the "Trooper-gate Scandal" findings that nearly derailed Bill Clinton's 1992 Campaign died first. If only corpses could talk...

    If only corpses could talk. What would they say? What do they know? What would they reveal? Unfortunately, there are far too many corpses of men, women, and children surrounding the Clintons. While suicide, suspicious deaths, and killings surrounding those with information regarding the Clintons could be simply a coincidence, it is simply quite suspicious. If only corpses could talk...
(c)Sean Bianca GOPGIRL 2017

#SethRichCoverUp #ShawnLucas #KlausEberweinSuicide #PeterSmithSuicide 



Monday, July 17, 2017

Why Hasn't the FBI Arrested Linda Sarsour?

     If you are still paying interest then Sharia Law hasn't taken over #justsaying - Linda Sarsour on Twitter May 12, 2015

    If you are still paying interest Sharia Law still hasn't taken over America -Linda Sarsour on Twitter May 12, 2015

   You'll know when you're living under Sharia Law if suddenly all your loans & credit cards become interest free. Sound nice, doesn't it? -Linda Sarsour on Twitter May 12, 2015

  Apparently the FBI no longer takes threats on the president and his administration seriously. In the past, if a man, woman, or group called for "war" against the president, that person or group would be arrested immediately. As of today no arrest has been made.  Nearly two weeks ago Palestinian-American anti-Israel, pro-Sharia Law activist, Linda Sarsour, called for Muslims to unite and wage jihad against President Trump and his administration, and to date no action against Sarsour has been taken. Since when is it acceptable for anyone to call for a "holy war" against the president? Since when is it acceptable for anyone to call for a "holy war" against a president's administration? 

   As so it would seem if one is a Muslim they are given a free pass to threaten the president and his administration. While campaigning, President Trump said he would ban all Muslims from entering the United States. The President's sentiments have since changed. Perhaps, banning all Muslims would be extreme. Then again, there are Muslims here in the U.S. at present and around the world that believe in the caliphate and believe that Islam will one day rule the world. In knowing this, one can't help, but be alarmed when a known activist with ties to the terrorist group Hamas calls for "jihad" or a "holy war" against the president and his administration. One also can't help, but wonder why an activist with terrorist ties hasn't been arrested. Is it that the president feels obligated to not go after a Muslim, because she is a Muslim? As so it would appear, yes it is. As if anyone else, a non-Muslim were to call for a "holy war" against the president and his administration, I would guess they would surely be arrested. 

   It is concerning that the arrest of Linda Sarsour has not been made. It is concerning as one can't help, but wonder if the president and his administration are looking the other way, because Linda Sarsour is a Muslim.  As President Trump was widely criticized for his anti-Muslim rhetoric, I would hate to think that he would cave to the critics, but appearances lead one to think perhaps he is. The fact is Linda Sarsour is a known anti-Israel American-Palestinian pro-Sharia Law activist. The fact is Linda Sarsour did call for Muslims in the name of Allah to wage "jihad" against our president and his administration. The fact is Linda Sarsour should be in jail. The fact is Linda Sarsour calling for "jihad" against the president and his administration makes her a threat to the president. The fact is Linda Sarsour calling for Muslims to unite as to wage "jihad" on the president and his administration makes Linda Sarsour a homegrown terrorist and an enemy of the State. Any enemy of the State should not be tolerated. They should be arrested without hesitation regardless of their religious affiliation. With that being said, why hasn't the FBI arrested Linda Sarsour?
-Sean Bianca GOPGIRL 2017
#LindaSarsour #ArrestLindaSarsour 

Wednesday, July 12, 2017



  Russia, Russia, Russia, all the talk in mainstream media and among the Democrats is Russia. Well, if the mainstream media and Democrats want to talk about Russia, let's talk about Russia! Let's talk about the FACT that former President Obama, his administration, Hillary Clinton, and the State Department approved the sale of 20% of U.S. uranium assets. Let's talk about the "radioactive scandal". The scandal to the tune of more than $145 million in secret donations involving the "Russian government", foreign financiers, and the Clinton Foundation. The fact is mainstream media and the Democrats want to talk about Russia, but only "their" side of Russia, and "their" side of Russia is only falsehoods, and misguided information in regards to the Trump administration and Russia. The fact is there is reason to talk, "Russia", a $145 million reason to talk "Russia".

   Want to talk about "Russia"? Just ask the author, Peter Schweizer, of the New York Times best selling book, "Clinton Cash". In 2015 Schweizer's book was a New York Times best seller that the Clintons feared. Turns out the book, revealing how the Clintons went from having millions of dollars in debt to earning over $130 million was somewhat ignored. As mainstream media wanted Hillary to win the 2016 presidential election, there was little talk about the best selling book, "Clinton Cash". The book revealed how the Clintons were made rich, very rich with the help of foreign governments, like "Russia" and  "Saudi Arabia" and foreign businesses, and oh yes, the infamous, "Clinton Foundation".  This best seller so feared by the Clintons was never even mentioned during the campaign by the press. Not only was it not mentioned, it was pretty much ignored. A multi million dollar deal involving 20 percent of all U.S. uranium assets was made, and not once was presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, questioned about it in any of the numerous presidential debates. Trivial questions such as one on regarding Rosie O'Donnell were asked of our President, yet a question involving 20% of all U.S. uranium assets and $145 million payment to the Clinton Foundation were not of enough relevancy to ask Hillary Clinton? Apparently not. 

  Mainstream media, including the fair and balanced Fox stayed away from "Clinton Cash". They all stayed away from "Clinton Cash", as they knew every  bit of information in it was true. "Clinton Cash" couldn't be debunked. While everyone may have stayed away from "Clinton Cash", there was NO denying, "Clinton Cash". Why even two Pulitzer Prize winning investigative reporters, Jo Beck and Mike McIntire couldn't even "debunk" two of the most damaging chapters in Schweizer's, "Clinton Cash". In fact, Beck and McIntire ran a 3000 word New York Times front page piece validating Schweizer's claims. His claims, that Bill and Hillary Clinton aided a Mr. Frank Giustra, a Canadian financier and a small Canadian company in their obtainment of quite lucrative uranium mining concession from the Dictator in Kazakhstan. This same Canadian company which was renamed, "Uranium One", purchased uranium concessions in the United States. Russia, having a desire for uranium, then later purchased the Canadian company for a price Canadian investors couldn't refuse, and this is where the plot thickens...

  In order for the Russians to purchase the Canadian company, Uranium One, the approval of former President Obama and Hillary Clinton's State Department would have had to have been given. Why? Because uranium was and still is an important strategic commodity. A commodity worth up to $145 million. Coincidentally, $145 million in donations was given by nine share holders of Uranium One to the Clinton Foundation. These donations were made subject to the State Department's approval, and as Hillary was at the time the Secretary of State, the donations were approved with bells and whistles. These donations included donations from the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Teller, the Russian government, and other foreign financiers.  Thanks to Hillary Clinton, Russia at present owns twenty percent of  U.S. uranium assets.  When once questioned by a brazen reporter about the uranium deal, Hillary stated that the deal was untrue. She stated that she was not yet the Secretary of State and the dates failed to match up. She was incorrect, the dates did and still do match up. Another words, Hillary lied, but let's talk more about Russia...

   Russia, Russia, Russia. If mainstream media wants to talk about Russia, they need to educate the American people on not only the alleged collusion of the President's camp with Russia, but Hillary Clinton's receiving of $145 million from the Russian government and other foreign investors. The media wants to talk about Russia, then the media should talk about the "radioactive scandal" in which Hillary Clinton sold 20 percent of all U.S. uranium assets to Russia. Yes, let's talk,"Russia"!

#radiocativescandal #uraniumone #ClintonCash


Monday, July 10, 2017

"We Want God" And Oh Yea, The Meeting With Putin

  And when the day came on June 2nd, 1979, and one million Poles gathered around Victory Square for their very first mass with their Polish Pope, that day, every communist in Warsaw must have known that their oppressive system would soon come crashing down.They must have known it at the exact moment during Pope John Paul II's sermon when a million Polish men, women, and children suddenly raised their voices in a single prayer. A million Polish people did not ask for wealth. They did not ask for privilege. Instead, one million Poles sang three simple words: "We Want God." 
In those words, the Polish people recalled the promise of a better future. They found new courage to face down their oppressors, and they found the words to declare that Poland would be Poland once again.
As I stand here today before this incredible crowd, this faithful nation, we can still hear those voices that echo through history. Their message is as true today as ever. The people of Poland, the people of America, and the people of Europe still cry out "We want God."-President Donald Trump, Speech in Warsaw, Poland 
   "We want God", said America's President to the people of Poland. "We want God", three little words that reached out to the people of Poland and around the world. For the first time in a long time, an American President, said, "God", in a speech. For the first time in a long time, an American President not only said , "God", but he said, "we want God". For the people in Warsaw, Poland that were in attendance for President Trump's speech, those 3 little words were like music to the people's ears. For Christians around the world, those three little words were not little words at all. Those three little words meant everything and more to Christians around the world. "We want God", may have been taken from the Polish people and their desire for freedom, but "we want God", was and is also what a good many Christians feel and had felt, and have been, and are afraid to say out loud.  After two centuries of oppression, the Polish people were finally allowed to live in freedom.  They today stand as a free nation and are able to say out loud, "we want God". 

    The speech given in Warsaw, Poland was truly historic and touted as such by right wing journalists and critics. The speech truly invigorated the people of Poland as they listened to President Trump, and stood chanting, "Donald Trump, Donald Trump", and  waving American flags. The crowd was visibly in awe of America's newly elected President. They were in awe as the speech being delivered was truly a phenomenal speech. The speech not only brought "God" to the front lines of today's society, but the speech said something so many people needed so badly to hear. The President spoke of how  Poland, "gave all hope for a future in which good conquers evil". In a modern Europe where the threat of terrorism is an everyday possibility, those words were inspiring and comforting. In a modern Europe with open borders, the President spoke of countries protecting borders as to protect their citizens. With European feeling the devastating impact at present with open borders, President Trump's words were  profound. The President said exactly everything the people of Poland wanted to hear. The President also said everything European leaders most likely didn't want to hear, but so desperately needed to hear. 

     No sooner had mainstream media said little about President Trump's all historic speech did mainstream media then be so quick to jump on the President to criticize. The speech has now been criticized as it was too highly of a nationalist address.  One might think the media would have been somewhat surprised with the president's speaking out on Russia being a threat to western civilization, the media did not. Mainstream media could not  applaud the President for his brilliant speech in Warsaw, but they could not act fast enough with their snide commentary on his meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Some critics likened the meeting to an awkward Tinder date. Others jumped on how President Trump failed to press Putin on the subject of election meddling. How could the President have been any more brazen and pressing than to walk into the  meeting with Putin and immediately confront Putin on election meddling? The President could not have been any more forthright. While Democrats may not like the answer which was a flat out "no", do the Democrats honestly think Putin would have admitted to meddling in the 2016 Presidential election? Furthermore, there is zero proof of Russia meddling in our election . There is also zero proof that there was collusion between Russia and President Trump. Unfortunately, the Democrats refuse to accept the truth. The truth that they nominated the worst candidate for the 2016 Presidential election. The truth, that the people of this great nation had tired of failed liberal economic policies, failing health care, and failed illegal immigration and open border policies.

   As mainstream media seems to be stuck on the alleged collusion between the President and Russia, others are far more concerned with the present. At present, President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin have reached what U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson calls, a "defined agreement" on curbing violence or rather a "cease fire" in Syria. While the cease fire may not solve the Syrian crisis, it's a start. The two Presidents also spoke of the creation of a cyber security group or unit that would guard countries against election hacking and other negative cyber threats as well. Not surprisingly, President Trump was highly criticized for his talk of the creation of a cyber security unit with Russia and he has since somewhat backtracked on the idea. 

  "We want God" still weighs heavy on my mind. Apparently, "we want God", weighed not on the minds of those on the left. No, all the chatter has been nothing but the meeting with Putin, and the infamous sit in by First Daughter, Ivanka. The President left a meeting with other world leaders as to attend another meeting and he filled his seat with his daughter Ivanka. This action by the President sparked heavy much deserved criticism from the left . While it is customary for a President to have one of his  like minded Representatives fill his vacant seat, daughter Ivanka was simply unacceptable. The fact is, the First Daughter is not a Conservative. Ivanka is a registered Independent globalist who leans to the left , much like her husband, Jared. The conservative sons of the President would have been a far better choice as they do in fact share the same views as their father.  While it is infuriating that mainstream media has criticized a highly successful over seas trip by the president, it is at the same time amusing. It is amusing as First Daughter, Ivanka shares many if not the majority of the same viewpoints as those on the left. 

"We want God", is what should be in the hearts and minds of people when speaking of the President's latest trip overseas. For eight years America had a President defending the very people killing Christians, and today America has a President defending Christians for a change. The President's confronting Russian Vladidmir Putin on the alleged election meddling the moment he met Putin should have made headlines. The President's speech in Poland should have made headlines. "We want God", should have made headlines. Sadly, only the tired criticism of President Trump, and his daughter taking his seat made most headlines. Sadly, "we want God" failed to make the headlines. Sadly, mainstream media chooses to ignore that the President is correct. The President is correct to encourage the rhetoric of a nation wanting God, as in this dangerous world, the world that doesn't want "God" will desperately need "God".

(c)Sean Bianca GOPGIRLBLOG 2017



Monday, July 3, 2017

Wanted, Rubio, And Others For Treason !


   "If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter." ~ George Washington

      Article II of the United States Constitution states in Section 4 that"The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and misdemeanors."

    Wanted; Senators Marco Rubio (Fl.), Dane Feinstein(Ca.), Susan Collins (Me.), Kamala Harris(Ca.), Barbara Comstock(Va.), and Tammy Duckworth(Il.) for treason. On April 4, 2017, the Senate unbeknownst to most Americans, passed Senate Resolution 118. The resolution was introduced by Senator Harris and drafted by a Muslim organization, EmgageUSA, and the Muslim Public Affairs Council. Resolution 118 condemns hate crime and any other form of racism, religion, or ethnic bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus targeting a minority in the United States. Furthermore, this law will form an inter-agency task force. This task force will go after people who speak out against Muslims or the so called "protected class". Translation of this bill; the loss of your freedom of speech. 

   Americans should be irate as this is the beginning of the end for America. Thanks to little Marco Rubio and others, Americans are in danger of losing the country as they have known it. Little Marco, once elected by the Tea Party, was instrumental in working on getting this bill passed. Why EmgageUSA, formerly known as EmergeUSA even thanked Marco Rubio and his fellow constituents on their Facebook page; Thanks to the hard work of Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Senator Susan Collins, Senator Barbara Comstock,  and Senator Kamala Harris, we have achieved the approval of Senate Resolution 118, an anti-hate crimes bill drafted by Emerge-USA. It is days like this that Americans are reminded of this country’s founding principles: equal opportunity, freedom, justice. We are proud to help support the protection of these rights #amoreperfectunion #theamericandream”.

  While the thank you was awfully thoughtful, the fact that Muslims were celebrating Senate Resolution 118 was slightly disturbing. One of the very groups that worked to get this bill passed, EmgageUSA, has several members under close scrutiny under the FBI.  Throughout the years, Emerge, now Emgage, has had a number of events at terror linked-mosques and has also had several of its members placed on the terrorist watch list.

The co-founder of EmgageUSA (founded in 2006 as EmergeUSA), Khurrum Wahid, a South Florida attorney, is the organization’s National Board Co-Chair. In a 2011 interview with The Intelligence Report, the magazine of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), Wahid listed the numerous cases in which he has represented terrorists, including members of Al Qaeda, such as Omar Ahmed Abu Ali, who was sentenced to 30 years in prison in 2006 for joining al-Qaeda and plotting to assassinate President George W. Bush, Shahawar Matin Siraj, who was sentenced to 30 years in prison in 2007 for conspiring to plant bombs in New York City; Dr. Rafiq Sabir, who was convicted of conspiring to treat injured al-Qaeda fighters and was sentenced to 25 years in prison in 2007; Syed Hashmi, who was sentenced to 15 years in prison in 2010 for providing supplies and money to a senior al-Qaeda commander in Afghanistan. He also represented Hafiz Khan, who was sentenced to 25 years in federal prison in 2013 for funneling tens of thousands of dollars to the Pakistani Taliban. -

   While many Americans may care not to know more of their freedom of speech being taken away, the threat of Sharia Law might wake up those uncaring Americans. Senate Resolution 118 and House Resolution 257 will be the end of America as we have known it. If the two resolutions are passed into actual law, the law as it is written "will criminalize free speech". Our founding fathers gave us the "freedom of speech". Our founding fathers also gave the president the power to ban anyone threatening our country from coming into the country. Our founding fathers knew our great nation would inevitably have outsiders wanting to threaten our freedom and our way of life. Senate Resolution 118 and House Resolution 257 are all a part of a plan much greater than any American could ever imagine. These resolutions are a part of the plan to destroy America and take over America. The Muslim Brotherhood's plan has been all along, to eventually replace the U.S. Constitution with Sharia Law. The Muslim Brotherhood's plan is to chip away at our constitution with various laws like House Resolution 257 and  Senate Resolution 118. Both resolutions conveniently exclude Christians, yet protect Muslims. If passed, both resolutions will be the end of America, and it will be the fault of our Senators, Congressmen, President, and people,  for not speaking out and not taking action.

     America, the Trojan Horse, President Donald Trump spoke about, is already here in America. It is living and breathing in everyone's state, and everyone's town. The caliphate is here and it's here to take over America. America has been warned, and it is up to our President and lawmakers to stop it. The question is, are we too late?

(c)Sean Bianca GOPGIRL #SenateResolution118 #HouseResolution257


          HOUSE RESOLUTION 118

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Congratulations Mr. President Trump On The Reinstatement Of The Travel Ban!

      Yesterday, June 26, 2017 was a special day for Americans. It was a special day as the block of the President's travel ban was lifted. It was a special day for our President. It was a special day for the American people. It was a special day for the American people as the American people could feel some sense of security. Americans for the first time in a long time could feel they had a President who truly wished to protect the American people. For eight years America had a president who was more concerned with offending Muslims than protecting the American people and finally, after eight long agonizing years America has a president that has spoken with his order of the travel ban and said, "America first"! 
     While the travel ban may be too little too late, it's something. It's something that will hopefully give the President's administration the time needed to devise a stricter vetting process on Muslims coming into the country. As the religion of Islam is anything, but peaceful. It would be nice if the vetting process would be so strict that not a "one", more Muslim could enter the country. While that may sound harsh and less than compassionate, the fear Americans have of Muslims is warranted. All Americans need for validation of their desire to keep Muslims out of the United States, is to look at Europe. Europe is becoming a vast wasteland of crime, mass raping, and terrorism thanks to the immigration of Muslims. One can't really blame Americans for not wanting America to result in the same fate. With 50 Muslim majority countries in the world, one has to wonder why Muslims relocating feel a need to come to America. One would think Muslims would prefer to reside where others are of the same faith and live under Sharia Law. Sharia Law is not compatible with the constitution. Therefore, those Muslims choosing to live under Sharia Law should avoid coming to America. It has been reported that 51% of all Muslim Americans want Sharia law in the United States. That being said justifies not a partial ban on Muslims, but a total ban on Muslims. 
     It is the President's right to ban whomever he or she deems a threat to our nation and its people. Those Muslims who follow the Koran and wish to live under Sharia Law and not the constitution, should not be allowed into our country. The reinstatement of the travel ban as issued by President Trump is a victory, and he is to be congratulated. He is to be congratulated, as he has taken the first step towards making America safe again.
(c)Sean Bianca, GOPGIRL 2017 

Sunday, June 25, 2017

Mr. President, May I remind you...


 Mr. President, with all due respect, I'd like to remind you of one of your most important campaign promises. Mr. President, you pledged that if elected you would, "repeal and replace Obamacare with something much better". In fact, Mr. President, you pledged this campaign promise, not once, not twice, but several times over.  You pledged to "repeal and replace" Obamacare. When campaigning, Mr. President, you never once said you would simply "dress up" Obamacare and call it something anew. Not once did you mention higher premiums, gigantic medicaid cuts, or an age tax increasing their healthcare premiums by 800%. Not once did you, Mr. President, mention you would allow states to do away with the essential healthcare protection benefits section. Not once, Mr. President, did you mention that you would not repeal and replace Obamacare, but dress it up, rename it as so it could provide higher tax cuts for millionaires, billionaire, insurance companies and drug companies. Not once, Mr. President, did you mention the newly proposed healthcare bill would do nothing to benefit Americans making under 200k and decimate the American healthcare system. Not once did you, Mr. President, tell Americans that you had no intention of helping them be able to afford healthcare. Not once did you, Mr. President, tell Americans watching the many presidential rallies that you had no intention of fully repealing and replacing Obamacare. 

    Did you lie Mr. President? Did you lie to the millions of Americans who supported and voted for you? Did you lie or did you just not think repealing and replacing Obamacare was all that important? Shame on me, I suppose, as I thought you realized the severity of repealing and replacing Obamacare. As you, Mr. President, and all of Washington knew Obamacare was imploding, forgive me as I was under the impression you did know the urgency and severity of repealing and replacing Obamacare. Why, Mr. President, you yourself even had a plan of your own. Mr. President you even published a seven-point healthcare reform plan. Your plan actually repealed Obamacare. Your plan broke down state barriers that prevented the sale of health insurance across state lines that made the health insurance of individuals premium insurance payments fully tax deductible. Mr. President, your plan was supposed to provide more affordable healthcare for Americans. Mr. President, your plan was to provide higher quality healthcare for Americans. Perhaps you've forgotten your jabs at Obamacare. Let me refresh your memory, as I remember your jabs quite well. I remember, as I was a victim and felt the pain of being under the dreaded Obamacare. I laughed as you joked to those at a rally held sometime last year. Mr. President, you said that one would have to be dying as to reap the benefits of Obamacare. In all seriousness, I thought I might die just signing up for Obamacare. I'm quite sure some did. 

   Mr. President, I am sorely disappointed in you at present. The newly proposed healthcare bill is not the plan you touted as your seven point plan. The newly proposed bill does not lower healthcare premiums. The newly proposed healthcare bill does not provide higher quality care for the American people. Mr. President, the newly proposed healthcare bill does not benefit the American people making under 200k. It benefits the millionaires, and billionaires, insurance, and drug companies. Mr. President, the newly proposed healthcare bill benefits the very people that you said your plan would not benefit. Why, Mr. President, your seven point healthcare plan was to benefit the millions of hardworking Americans that so desperately needed a break and tax benefits. Mr. President, I ask, how can you endorse the newly proposed healthcare act that is opposed by even those in your own party? The Donald Trump I voted for would call out this plan for what it is. the Donald Trump I voted for would tell Republicans to rewrite the bill until the bill was a truly new bill. The Donald Trump I voted for would advise the Senate to work day and night until they came up with a bill that truly replaced Obamacare with a better healthcare plan. The Donald Trump I voted for would tell the American people that this newly proposed healthcare bill would decimate an already failed healthcare system. The Donald Trump I voted for would have looked at the newly proposed healthcare bill and said to the senate, "you're fired". Mr. President, the man I voted for would have looked out for the American people , the people who supported and voted for you. Mr. President, the people have spoken and the people can speak again. We, the people, voted for a man that said he would "repeal and replace" Obamacare. We, the people, did not vote for a man that said dress up and change the name of Obamacare. Mr.President, just as we the people voted for you in 2016, we can just as easily not vote for you in 2020. Mr. President, it is my hope that I will be again voting for you in 2020. Mr. President, I must remind you, "repeal and replace"!
(c)Sean Bianca GOPGIRL 2017

Saturday, June 17, 2017

Islam And Liberalism

     "And kill them (the unbelievers) wherever you find them , and drive them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers." - The Koran

   "They've marched, they've bled - yes, some of them have died. This is hard. Every good thing is. We have done this before. We can do this again.- Former U.S. Attorney General, Loretta Lynch-February 2017

 "What we've got to do is fight in Congress, fight in the courts, fight in the streets, fight online, fight at the ballot box, and now there's the momentum to do this." - Tim Kaine Jan. 2017

   An Islamist following the Koran has zero tolerance for those following other religions. A liberal who is a member of the Democratic party has zero tolerance for those of the opposing party. An Islamist believes he  must slaughter anyone and everyone who does not believe as he. A liberal belonging to the Democratic party apparently also believes those in opposition to his party should be killed. This fascist behavior was shown this week when a Bernie Sanders supporter, James Hodgkinson from Illinois made the decision to be a political terrorist. This past Wednesday, during a Congressional Baseball practice in Alexandria Virginia at Eugene Simpson Stdium Park, a mass shooting was conducted by Hodgkinson. Hodgkinson, a disgruntled Bernie supporter let off 50 shots, injuring one city police officer and critically injuring another. House Majority Whip Republican Steve Scalise from Louisiana was shot in the hip and sustained multiple injuries to his hip, pelvis and internal organs. While the prognosis is good, the recovery will be long. Thankfully, no one was killed as the outcome could have been far worse had it not been for the presence of the security detail for Rep. Steve Scalise. But, for the presence of Capitol Police the gunman, Hodgkinson, was shot and killed.

  Later on that day, Congress took to the floor as to speak out for unity. Minority Leader, Nancy Pelosi even went so far as to say that she prayed for not only former President Barrack Obama, but the President and his family as well. For a moment I'm quite sure most of America  went into cardiac arrest at Nancy Pelosi's kind words. The trouble is, it's too little, too late. It's too late as the Democrats have been encouraging violence since President Trump took to the campaign trail. Numerous reportings and tapes were leaked of people being paid to attack Trump's supporters. Innocent people supporting the President were beaten up and harassed at the hands of those on the left. Surprisingly, no one was killed. I can't help, but wonder if a Trump supporter had been killed by a thug from the left, if they would have done a happy dance and jumped for glee. 

    Islam and Liberalism are really quite alike. Neither Islamists nor liberals want anyone believing any way other than their way. Frighteningly, liberals appear to have been listening to their leaders' calls for violence and bloodshed. This was proven this past week. While the shooter is said to have acted alone, one can't help but question his acting alone. The shooter somehow, some way knew of the Congressional Baseball practice early Wednesday morning. How? The Congressional Baseball practice was not common knowledge. That being said, the shooter may have not acted alone. The shooter also carried a list of Republican Congressional members in his pocket. The purpose is unknown. Could it have been an assassination list? We'll never know, although it's been recently reported that there have been numerous threats to Republican congressman showing the threat of political terrorism is real.

   The call for violence from the left must come to an end. Repeatedly, the Democrats are making inflammatory remarks against the President and repeatedly the behavior is accepted. Whether it's the former Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, calling for bloodshed or washed up pop star, Madonna, saying she's" thought and awful lot about blowing up the White House", or comedian, Kathy Griffith holding a fake decapitated President Trump bloody head, it's got to stop. It's got to stop before it's too late. As eventually there will be a day when a gunman is successful in his mission to kill Republicans, and if that day comes, the blood will be on the hands of the left. 

  Liberalism is becoming as evil as the religion of Islam. It's as evil, as it condones the bullying and killing of Republicans. It's evil, as it is non- accepting of anyone having any other beliefs other than the belief system of liberalism. In knowing this, it has become clear as to why liberals are so dead set against a ban on Muslims. Why, they are almost one in the same. It is said that birds of a feather flock together, and if such is true, heaven help us as the left seems all too intent on the destruction of a nation of capitalism and freedom. Islam and liberalism; will it be our demise or will President Trump keep his campaign promise and ban Muslims before the two ban together and America is lost forever?
(c)Sean Bianca GOPGIRL 2017